I have been following locally sourced news from VN for more
than a decade; often with a filter or lens that takes account of the flaws that
afflict news sources all around the world, but moreso in Vietnam:
There is
a push for an attention grabbing headlines first and foremost
The facts
in news stories are mostly very short term or even speculative with context
Like
international TV news or tabloid press, there is an acceptance of extreme views
Unlike
contemporary international news, there are rarely links
Converting
from a controlled economy, the VN news still believes planned targets are law
There is confusion
that business is a horserace or sports event where we see ‘winning’
There is
a mix of rumor and news, particularly when personalities are involved
You can perceive
a connection between news items and short term trading impulses
No implication that the facts presented are wrong, but just
not in sufficient context (and not improving over time). I personally feel that there is circularity –
the more the news sources fail to offer context and perspective, the more the
consumers expect this of the news. The more they expound on speculation, the
more readers follow the speculation instead of searching for the background.
Surely the international news scene has similar short term
popular news providers everywhere, but they now get caught out by internet
based fact checkers, and of course long form editors. For VN there are always the international sources
that do similar long form essays, but not as many as for other similar
countries. I try to read as much as I can about the region, and this malaise
shows for neighbors as well.
I offer, as an example, the reporting on the VN
economy. Every economy has positives and
negatives, but the articles that appear in the press usually take an either all
positive attitude or an all negative attitude, rarely with counter arguments or
links to data. Someone appears to be feeding trading mentality – short term at
every turn. Getting the headlines without the context.
We the readers may be a fault for not calling them out, but
I prefer to blame the editors. Coming off decade of censorship, I am going to
guess that they are older and do not want to take any risks.
No comments:
Post a Comment