A universal framework, as we read the gurus’ views on what
matters both in the past year and the coming decade trumpets the success of
those who strive for cumulative marginal advantages. From sports to politics to business to
technology; individuals and organizations appear to devote their focus on the
gaining of, sometimes small, marginal advantages to advance their mission or
personal goals.
Strategy, and hence risk, becomes operational when the focus
is so tight. Missing are the concepts of
sustainability, or appropriateness (sorry to mention UDAAP), or long term, or
economic considerations. We find institutions
and companies and individuals pursuing small marginal advantage simply for the
sake of attaining that advantage no matter what or oblivious to the long term
cost.
The conclusion that the tide has shifted to short term
attainment of cumulative marginal comparative advantage derives from stories
and articles and even research across all sorts of information sources. Media can and does focus on the short term,
and on the ‘winners’ no matter how small or pyrrhic the victory. Negative results,
even many years later, are often attributed to events in a different time
frame. The costs or the consequences are
seldom associated with the successes.
How did this operational/competitive focus emerge? I believe
information speed combined with the talents of those well-schooled in marketing
have been the leading light. Add the prevalence
of short termism or diminution of long term accountability and the picture
becomes a bit clearer. The public view of everything seems short term, and the
long form recedes.
This framework – identifying a concentration on cumulative
marginal advantages – works for many analytic tasks. Strategists can rejoice in short term
gains. Risk managers can watch their
statistics improve. Sports figures can
achieve single year triumphs. Politicians in the US can win primaries. All we
have to do is find a constituency not satisfied with the short term.
No comments:
Post a Comment