I confess to be near a Howard Beale moment. The
number of people you meet face to face , but mostly on the media (and all over
the radio) who have adapted and adopted vocal fry as their chosen speaking
affectation seems to grow exponentially every week. Last night there was a
wonderful television interview
with a Supreme Court Justice, but the youthful interviewer was
drowning in her own vocal fry so badly that I switched channels.
Vocal
fry is a very purposeful speech affectation where the speaker imitates
having gravel stick in their throat and growls their words almost
unintelligibly. Think Clint Eastwood at
his worst, but with the younger generation it appears that they growl for the
sake of growling….and you just don’t understand A WORD.
Some popular singers have always had a rough singing style,
but this is not stylistic…it is pure affectation and it is increasingly done
without nuance, and really not very well.
Some describe vocal
fry as an epidemic among young females, as if the younger generation needs
another way to not be understood.
I intend to walk away…to tune out….to turn off when vocal
fry abounds. Even NPR, probably the
worst offender, can take its hyphenated vocal fry broadcasters and throw them
in the Potomac. I will settle for
reading transcripts of the Ruth Baden Ginsberg interview. She speaks clearly
and without affectation.
No comments:
Post a Comment