Wednesday, February 24, 2016

Grand Game of Bargains – Complexity that defies reform


We climbed to the mountaintop to visit the all-knowing source of wisdom:

Bureaucracy is in need of reform, but our politics creates a system that will not be reformed

“The group in control of the government always receives a share of benefits,

and the coalition that forges a partnership with the government splits the remainder.”

                                                                                                                   Calomiris and Haber (2014)

 

Why can our companies . large and small, control costs but our governments cannot?

 

The Game of Bargains thus is driven by the logic of politics, not the logic of economics. This view of the regulatory system constrains the possible scope for sustaining effective reforms. In a democracy persistent popular support is necessary, but “self-interested” groups will have strong vested interests in forming powerful coalitions to oppose reform and distract and misinform the voting public. Distract them with complexity.

 

Complexity dominates everything in our daily lives.  Why cannot things be simplified?

 

Reform efforts are further hampered by the fact that regulatory reform is complicated and the consequences of bad policies may not emerge for a number of  years. The dominant political coalition with a stake in the existing system may add further complexities to make it difficult for the majority of voters to understand what is  happening. This kind of opacity (whether purposeful or not) undoubtedly impedes reform efforts.

 

I cannot follow politics anymore – since I have concluded that it is a Game of Bargains.  Since the perpetrators continue to add complexity and opacity and the talking heads can day or do anything they wish. They have won.  The battle to be fought is not by my generation, who benefit from the Game of Bargains (since we do not pay for what we have). The younger generations should be fighting this battle, but self-absorption is the rule.

 

So let’s all read Kunstler, pull out old references to Hegel, and let Trump carry on.

Thursday, February 4, 2016

Demystifying China Economics


Spent a bit of time in China this past year, so the telephone and email questions are coming in unexpected quantity.  Fortunately there are now many sources of quick and accurate expertise (see below), however there is a compelling reason to dispel rumors and folklore.  I will try.

No, the China economy is not in trouble.  With 5-7% growth and $3 trillion in reserves there are challenges that difficult to resolve, and issues often surfacing, but the economy is quite strong.

Yes, the data from China is not always transparent, but neither is ours. Increasingly sources of good data emerge so that at many levels we can actually see clear views .

No, the commodity and currency markets will not remain stable over the near term; but that is a multi factor phenominon only some of which involve China.

Yes there are bubbles in the China economy, remarkably similar to the US in 2007.  The bank balance sheets are hugely inflated with poor loans and the banks in China , like ours in 2008, must be recapitalized. The order of magnitude, compared to available reserves, makes the recapitalization feasible.  We cannot say, however, when and how fast this will occur.

No, the path to revaluation is not predictable, so although over the long term we can say that the Chinese currencies are overvalued compared to the dollar we cannot predict exact fluctuations in timing or order of magnitude.

Yes, all the ‘smart’ money has a long term short position on the Renminbi, but these are very long positions indeed.  Anyone advising on short term moves should be ignored.

No, the macro view is not the whole picture, for there are economic issues at the regional and local level that require serious expertise.  If you or your firm is working with China it is best to do your homework.

Many reports and webinars and television interviews are available, concise, and clear:


From Charlie Rose, the El-Erian interview is perfect on China http://www.charlierose.com/watch/60678030

From CNBC there was a short interview with Kyle Bass that is very poignant http://www.cnbc.com/2016/02/03/kyle-bass-china-banks-months-away-from-danger-territory.html


In general, hyperbole concerning China is usually just that.